Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 15, 2010, 9:10 PM   #1
Junior Member
Jarrod1986's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
Default Question about the Nikon 55-200mm VR and the Nikon 70-300mm VR

Ok, so I recently bought a Nikon D3000 as my first D-SLR camera and I love it. I bought it with the lens kit which included the Nikon 18-55mm VR and the Nikon 55-200mm VR. I want to shoot mainly Wild life/Nature photography and also Sunsets. So heres my question. I have the 55-200mm VR lens, but should I go out and buy the Nikon 70-300mm VR lens. Also if I do buy the 70-300 should I keep my 55-200mm lens or sell it to help pay for my new lens?

Thank you very much to everyone in advance for their help
Jarrod1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jan 15, 2010, 9:32 PM   #2
Senior Member
TCav's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826

For shooting wildlife, you should probably have the extra focal length. And if you've got the 70-300 VR, the 55-200 VR is redundant except possibly for sunsets and, of course, size and weight.
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:51 AM.