|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Savannah, GA (USA)
Posts: 22,378
|
![]()
hercules wrote:
Quote:
The dimensions of your images do not match up to any "standard" print size (4x6, 5x7, 8x10, 11x14). Either you crop them, or the software is going to crop them for you (which can lead to something important being cut off if you didn't have enough room at the edges). This has nothing to do with your camera outputting a 9 Megapixel image. If it were a 1.3 Megapixel Digicam, it would still need to crop, unless the aspect ratio of the image was right for the print size. The print drivers will resample the images if the resolution or too small or two great for a good match. But, this doesn't have anything to do with the dimensions of an image. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sparta, Greece
Posts: 2,649
|
![]()
Thanks JimC now i get it..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sparta, Greece
Posts: 2,649
|
![]()
I just have one more question, on a 4x6 print should you use the highest quality print or just the standard quality print. Thanks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Savannah, GA (USA)
Posts: 22,378
|
![]()
That's up to you. The highest quality uses the most ink, so it costs more. But, you may be satisfied with a lower quality image. Try it and see.
I did some prints both ways when I had an IP4000, and I tended to stick with higher quality for the most part (lower quality modes resulted in lighter images with it). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|