|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 788
|
![]()
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #000000"
Quote:
Hmmm, it certainly sound buffering to me! :-):-) I know that the CCD of the K.M. dSLR camerasare larger inphysical dimensions, than the CANON's APS-C 1.6 crop factor CMOS image sensors. Usually, lenses tend to perform better on the smaller image sensors, that's why I usually noticed that light fall off,purple fringing, and C.A.(s)areusually considerably lesswith the Canon's 1.6 crop factor dSLR cameras; with the same lenses involved. Perhaps, the CCD and mount design of the K.M. dSLR cameraswere designed in such a way, that the lenses being fitted on tothem are closer to the CCD. There is always a considerable amount of advantage when the lensescan belocated closer to the image sensor, and there is also a significantamount of advantage when the light rays can be made tofall as perpendicularly as possible; on to the image sensor. (Usually this can only be achieved when the lens is madecloser to the image sensor, orwhen the manufacturer canmake the image sensor smaller in dimension) :| |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|