|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,216
|
![]()
Yes, exactly like that. A little bit advanced maybe.
I experienced that the important things is to have a stand that keeps the frames steady and at the same time easy to fill in. With a little imagination you'll easily be able to make your own. Save the money. The Backlight has to be heavy and diffused. Remember to adjust the light to tungsten or whatever source you're using. If you go here http://www.pbase.com/image/4914790 you will see a dias copied with my CP5000 in macro and as described above. I think it OK! Satisfies me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 76
|
![]()
reviving an old thread.
I find it hard to believe that a $60 is going to preserve thousands of my families priceless photos better than a Good Nikon Slide Scanner http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=98 or a A good flatbed Microtek ScanMaker i700 (Digital Ice) http://www.microtekusa.com/smi700.html UMAX PowerLook 2100XL (No disigal Ice) http://www.umax.com/scanners/index.j...num=SPKG-14128 Is $1500 to much to spend for priceless photos? Does anyone have a good side by side comparison? Thanks! KM |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|