Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 19, 2010, 11:42 AM   #11
Senior Member
VTphotog's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,309

800 f/8. Don't ever have to walk very far with it.
Seriously, though, a prime doesn't really have the versatility for a walk-around for me. Gone are the days of the SRT-102 and 50 f/1.4 as my total kit.

VTphotog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 19, 2010, 11:47 AM   #12
Senior Member
dr_spock's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 879

Originally Posted by VTphotog View Post
800 f/8. Don't ever have to walk very far with it.

What doesn't kill you will make you a stronger photographer.
dr_spock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 19, 2010, 11:49 AM   #13
Senior Member
tclune's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,093

I just got a D5000, and the first lens I got was the 35mm 1.8. It takes me back to the days of my first "real" camera, a Voigtlander Vito CLR. It was a delight, and so is this lens/camera combo. I just got back from a short trip to Montreal and Quebec City with that as my only lens. I've got the 55-200mm 4.5-5.6 VR, but it was going to be just too much new stuff to try to learn both lenses along with the camera.

There were a couple of photos I didn't take, or compromised on, because of the lens -- I would have loved a bright ultrawide for inside the Notre Dame basillica, and I was too self-conscious to take a photo of a student sitting under a tree outside McGill reading one of the "For Dummies" series of books. Those are the times that I like a tele, to sneak a photo that I want but am too self-conscious to ask permission for.

But the photo that got away on this trip is one I think I would always lose, and I wish I knew how to get them. On the train, a woman had a crying baby. She managed to get the baby to go to sleep by walking up and down the aisle. As she passed, the baby was serenely sleeping, and the mother's face was filled with worry. It was the very definition of the parent/child relationship, but even if I could aim and shoot fast and accurately with my camera, I expect that the mother's expression would change before I could get the shot.
tclune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 20, 2010, 3:05 PM   #14
Junior Member
Northstar's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 24

Originally Posted by mtngal View Post
I find the 50 mm either too long or too short for walk-around. If I want to walk-about light I take a 35 f2.8 macro and a 77 f1.8. Or if I'm in the mood I'll go "heavy" and take just a 200 f2.8, I tend to either really zoom in or else go "normal".
I agree... I do find that the 50 mm is bit to long sometimes. I will probably take a look into getting a 30mm or 35mm

Thanks for all the feed back!
Canon T1i/500D
Northstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2010, 8:24 PM   #15
Senior Member
Old Boat Guy's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: East Texas
Posts: 363

I noticed a number of the responses were for Cannon. Shooting with a Sony I would do indoors with my 28mm f/2 or outdoors with the 85mm f/1.4 .

The "If you could only carry one" is a tough question when it comes to Prime lenses. If I could only OWN one lens it would have to be the 50mm f/1.4 (I think)


or maybe the 100mm f/2.0 macro
Old Boat Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2010, 8:45 PM   #16
Senior Member
tjsnaps's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Posts: 652

I have an old MF 105mm 2.5 that I still use quite a bit So it would be that or my old tokina 17mm which has much less distortion than my kit lens at 18mm.
tjsnaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 12:15 PM   #17
Senior Member
Flying Fossil's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 750

For a walk around, I find the SAL 18-250 to be about perfect. Good image quality, plenty of width and length for most shooting.

It is not a prime but were talking walk around. This is mine.
A77, 28-75mm f/2.8, 16-50mm f2.8, 18-250mm f3.5, 70-300mm f4.5G SSM
Flying Fossil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 3:51 PM   #18
Super Moderator
peripatetic's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,599

50mm on my 5D2. I had the f1.2 but ended up getting rid of it in favour of the 1.4 - it was too heavy.

28mm f1.8 was utterly fantastic on the 1.6 crop. Loved that lens.

The 50 is all I really use.
My gallery
My X100 blog
peripatetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2010, 8:02 AM   #19
Senior Member
rienz's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Middle East
Posts: 103

50mm f/1.8 is my favorite walk around prime lens
Current Gear: Canon 7D+BG-E7 Battery Grip & 60D with EF 24-105 f/4 L IS; EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II; EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS; EF 100 f2.8 L IS; EF 50 f/1.8 II; Canon Speedlite 430 EX II; Metz 58 AF-1; Canon RC-5 Wireless Remote Controller & RS-80N3 Remote Switch; Manfrotto 190CX PRO4 with Manfrotto 322RC2 Grip Ball Head; Kenko Extension Tube Set; B+W UV & Polorizing filters
rienz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 29, 2010, 1:58 PM   #20
Senior Member
LTZ470's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,487

Canon 100mm 2.8L Macro...Dustin talked me into it and it is a great lens, and have found I can take a nice trip with just it on the 7D...it is a super lens...way more advanced than my skillset for sure...
LTZ470 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:29 PM.