Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 3, 2009, 10:02 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 109
Default Should I pay for the extended service plan?

Many have said this is how the company's rake in the money...that it's not worth getting....that if you are going to have a problem, most likely it will be within the first year of owning the camera.

There are many things that could go wrong with a SLR camera. I am thinking about dropping the $100 or so to extend it for another 2 years. Do you agree with this philosophy?
Blueberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 4, 2009, 1:41 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
kazuya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,006
Default

i dont normaly take it, but when i bought my nikon d90 i was offered 5yrs accidental damage for 60, so i took it. the regular price was 170, which i wouldnt have taken, thats like a thired of the camera price.
i think it depends a lot on the camera cost, the cover cost and the length of cover.
the peace of mind is good though
kazuya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2009, 8:36 AM   #3
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529
Default

I think the answer depends on what the plan covers. Kazuya references a policy that protects against damage. That's not a bad thing to have - although I simply cary a Personal Aricles policy at State Farm - so I'm covered for damage, theft, etc. If it's just a policy covering against the standard failure of the device as opposed to damage or theft then absoultely it's a money-maker for the company. But, everyone is different. If it gives you peace of mind to have the policy and the money is no object then it may be worth the investment simply for that peace of mind
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2009, 9:12 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 109
Default

Thanks for your replies. I found something interesting; I was able to obtain a extended 2 year coverage on my camera for less money at Nikon's web site compared to getting it at the store where I purchased the D5000. It makes sense since the store gets some money in their pockets when a customer gets a extended warranty. It was under $100 for the extended war. so I went for it.

By the way your homeowners insurance does not cover your camera if it malfunctions. It only covers it for theft, fire, or things like water damage from a broken pipe. You can add the personal article coverage which will extend coverage to almost anything like dropping it on accident, but I believe mechanical breakdown is still not covered.
Blueberry is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:44 AM.