Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 2, 2004, 6:53 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1
Default

Most digital cameras have jpeg formats - some offer Tiff and Raw. Is there any advantage having Tiff and even raw?
KiwiDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Oct 2, 2004, 11:57 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Mikefellh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,707
Default

The difference is what's done to the image before saving the image to the card.

- RAW, just saves the raw data from the CCD without any in-camera processing.
- TIFF, processes the image depending on your camera's settings (white balance, etc.), but does no compression of the image.
- JPG, does the same in-camera processing like TIFF, but the image is saved as a JPG with light to heavy compression depending on JPG setting.
Mikefellh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2004, 1:47 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 544
Default

RAW offers the opportunity to do maximum file processing outside the camera (in your computer). You can adjust factors like white balance, saturation, etc.after taking a picture. This means an extra step, but gives you maximum control of your photos before saving them as TIFFs or JPEGs. Consider RAW files as your unprocessed "negatives".
Wildman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2004, 12:16 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
Default

I generally agree with Mikefellh, but he isn't exactly correct. There are several compressed TIFF formats (and an uncompressed one.) There are a few cameras that actually support it (I believe that Nikon makes a few.) But the reality is that the processing power of a camera is too low for compressed TIFF to be useable. It took way to long to compress and write the picture to the CF card.

To me, there is no point in using TIFF in-camera. Either you JPG or RAW. TIFF can store more colors than JPG, and they support non-destructive compression (if implemented.) Guess what? RAW supportes more colors than JPG and has some are compressed (always non-destructively.) The only benefit that TIFF has over RAW is that with RAW you have to convert it to another format for editing. TIFF is a standard format that doesn't require "conversion" 'cause most editors support it.

Now, if you want to use TIFF to store the converted RAW file, that makes sense. But using TIFF in camera doesn't (to me.)

Eric
eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2004, 1:26 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Mikefellh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,707
Default

To be honest, that response was taken from another reply on a specific camera, which doesn't do compressed TIFF.

The difference between the compressed TIFF and the JPG, is JPG is a lossy compression, while the TIFF compression gives you the exact image back when uncompressed as it was before it was compressed.

I will add that many cameras don't have a RAW mode but do offer a TIFF mode, and although most consumer cameras don't make it worth it quality-wise, there is the option to shoot in TIFF (which I occassionally do with mine if it's a shot for competition).
Mikefellh is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:05 PM.