Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 23, 2004, 10:07 AM   #1
Member
 
Steve K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 60
Default

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/23/te...ts/23spec.html

Here is an excerpt:

"Joshua Kairoff, director of display engineering for Pioneer Electronics, calls specs "the low-hanging fruit of technical information" and a tempting tool for marketing departments looking to distinguish their products, even if the specs themselves mislead or shed little light. They also help manufacturers and retailers sell upgrades or higher-end models. A five-megapixel digital camera may seem alluring ("More Megapixels, Better Memories!" promises an ad for the retailer Good Guys), even though "most people's three-megapixel cameras are more than adequate for almost all photography use," said Mark Rutherford, a photographer with studios in Oakland, Calif., and New York City. While megapixel numbers are consistent - camera makers all count them the same way - a given camera's megapixels may be no guide to color quality or sharpness. In many other product categories, specifications are not even based on a uniform measurement method from maker to maker, and tweaking tests to get desired results is a common practice called specsmanship."

:roll:
Steve K is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 23, 2004, 11:36 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 236
Default

AGREE 100%. Mega Pix are basically a selling tool. Bigger is not ALWAYS better.

It's what the camera DOES with the pixels is what counts.

Quote:
most people's three-megapixel cameras are more than adequate for almost all photography use
Unless you are a photography enthusiast. MOST people take snapshots and 3MP is just fine, in fact my 1.3MP is GREAT.

It's when you get semi-serious and want to blow shot up to 8x10 is when you start to have problems with low MP.

See my post
http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/v...249&forum_id=7
Grinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2004, 4:27 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
BillDrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hay River Township, WI
Posts: 2,512
Default

Steve K wrote:
Quote:
... even though "most people's three-megapixel cameras are more than adequate for almost all photography use," said Mark Rutherford,...
Simce most people print almost all their pictures at 4x6" almost all the time, he is right.
Steve K wrote:
Quote:
... In many other product categories, specifications are not even based on a uniform measurement method from maker to maker, and tweaking tests to get desired results is a common practice called specsmanship.
That goes on with just about any product more complex than pig iron. Reading several reviews, each by several reviewers, will go a long ways toward dealing with that. But even then, reviewers are not consistent. A camera that received good reviews a couple of years ago might be booed off the stage today.
BillDrew is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM.