Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 16, 2005, 2:06 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Default

So my issue is that my hands shake more then the average person. I am wondering if the optical stablization systems in cameras like the Fuji F10 and the Panasonic FX9 will help me take better pictures then a camera with it. I haven't quite figured out how these systems work or how well they work. Will it help me take better quality photos or just reduce the number of blurry shots?

I haven't owned a digital camera yet so I have nothing to compare it to. The only camera I own at the momment is a Cannon APS. I have had a few(very few) blurry photos in that caused from my hands shaking I think.
bikebro is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 16, 2005, 2:15 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
Posts: 4,036
Default

The stabilization in the FX9 is true mechanical stabilization and works very well to counter hand shake.

The Fuji F10 takes a different tact and allows you to make practical images at higher ISO. This increases your available shutter speed for a given limited light.

For still subjects you will get better shots with less noise in limited light with the FX9. But stabilization doesn't help at all for subject movement. For freezing action in available light the F10 is better.


slipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2005, 2:56 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 394
Default

I have what is sometimes called "essential tremor" it is a medical condition and as far as I know the cause is unknown. Image stabilization has been a big help for me to help with the camera shaking problem. When there is lots of light and corresponding fast shutter speeds it likely is not very important. In nearly all other conditions it will make a difference in and held photography.
normc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2005, 7:25 PM   #4
Moderator
 
Nagasaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 897
Default

There was a program on UK TV last night which tested image stabilization in a couple of camera. The result was quite convincing in favour of IS.
Nagasaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2005, 7:58 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 544
Default

IS really works... but you have to remember that IS works only against camera shake, NOT movement of the subject.

My EF-S 17-85IS lens lets me hand hold my 20D down to 1/13 second with good results. My old Canon Powershot Pro90IS has a 10X (37-370 35 mm equivalent lens). It's the size of a brick... not hardly "ultra compact". It produces great shots fully zoomed when hand held.

I know of now "ultra compacts" with decent reach and image stabilization. So far, it seems like one or the other in that category... either long reach OR stabilization. BTW, I define ultra compact as a camera that will fit in your pocket.
Wildman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2005, 10:01 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 394
Default

There is an excellent PhotoShop Plug in called "Focus Magic" that works for motion blur.
normc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 19, 2005, 1:37 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
msantos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 561
Default

The IS on Panasonics works excellent, I have two of them
msantos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2005, 1:00 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 121
Default

Personally, I'd be curious to know what the major qualitative differences are between optical, electrical, and digital stabilization are. I always assumed that electrical and digital stabilization were the same, but I could be wrong.

I'm considering the purchase of one of the following;

Sanyo C6 (digital stabilization)

Sony T9 (optical stabization)

With the Sanyo, part of the picture is slightly cropped around the borders when using the digital stabilization. Not sure if the same happens with the T9.

Any enlightenment?

Thanks,

Ran
theranman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2005, 1:58 PM   #9
E.T
Senior Member
 
E.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 921
Default

theranman wrote:
Quote:
Personally, I'd be curious to know what the major qualitative differences are between optical, electrical, and digital stabilization are.
Pretty much that later ones are same cheating and nothing more than PR lies.
Only types of real IS are optical which is done by having moving element in lens and KonicaMinolta's solution which moves sensor/CCD. (means all lenses are stabilized in its DSLRs)
E.T is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:11 PM.