Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 5, 2003, 10:30 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 6
Default Is it normal that a laptop view is superior to the print?

Just got my first prints from my new Canon A70. The prints were disappointing, with a little too much softness. When I downloaded to my laptop, they appeared much sharper.

The prints were made at Walmart where they read off my Compact Flash card.

I was ready to try another camera when I saw the prints, but after viewing the same pics on my laptop, I'm not so sure.

Can any one shed any light on this?

Mark
Matsquimac is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Apr 5, 2003, 10:58 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12
Default

are you viewing the picture at actual size because if its set to your laptop screen size it will obviously look better than it really is. a 3mp pic should be quite a bit larger than your screen
thedon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5, 2003, 11:08 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 6
Default Thanks, but I don't follow

The image on my laptop is 5 x 7, and the print is 4 x 6. The laptop view is sharper. Should the sharpness not decrease with an increase in size?

Sorry if I'm not getting it, i'm very new to digital cameras.

Thanks for your input.

Mark
Matsquimac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2003, 10:37 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 116
Default

One simple check might be to take one of the files to another source and have them print it...

A different store, Shutterfly on the web, or a friend with a photoprinter...see what you get...

Maybe Wal-Mart is having a problem.

Good luck.
rych26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2003, 11:36 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
digcamfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,422
Default

Hi Matsquimac,

Just curious, how do they print on your printer?

What printer do you have?

digcamfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2003, 1:28 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,162
Default

Maybe Walmart who service a lot of 1-2Mpix point and shoot kiddies have down sampled your images to get higher throughput?

You said what physical size your pic was, but you didn't say what resolution you shot it at. A 640X480 1/2 meg pix image can look OK on a VGA screen!
voxmagna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2003, 11:00 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 6
Default Still frustrated with my canon A70

I shot the pics at 2048 x 1536.

Unfortunately, I do not have access to a photo quality printer.

I will give Walmart a call to see how they produce the pics, but more and more, I am thinking that this camera has problems with focus.

Is there a better camera out there?

I had a Kodak 4330 and returned it because the flimsy lens cap was just to cheap and irritating. Now this. I'm a little frustrated. Maybe I'm expecting too much from a digital camera.

Any comments would be appreciated.

Mark
Matsquimac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2003, 5:59 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,162
Default

Hi,

Quote:
more and more, I am thinking that this camera has problems with focus.
3Mpix should be plenty, are your JPEG file sizes about 1.2Mbyte? I've had 6x41/2's printed and they were as sharp as film.

If you shoot some distant scenes in daylight, try zooming 300-400X on detail using your editor. Check your EXIF data for any focus or blur (slow shutter) warnings. If you have a RAW or uncompressed mode, do the focus test on this. Some people select high compression for more pics, and think JPEG artefacts and contouring are a focus problem, when they aren't.
voxmagna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2003, 8:34 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 6
Default Anything better than the Canon A70 in the price range?

Enlarging to test the focus is a great idea. Many images were sharp even when enlarged.

Some were not, and I'm not sure why. Lower light, even a cloudy day, seem to reduce the possibility of sharp focus. For the point and shoot crowd, this will be a little frustrating.

The A70 has such a very nice set of features, I may choose to put up with the occasionally erratic focus, unless I can find something better in the next few weeks.

Mark
Matsquimac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2003, 12:10 PM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 50
Default

remember that the print detail far surpasses the laptop. Just like even though the camera lcd shows the photo focused, the print will show the little bit off. Laptops are especially bad, in comparisson to monitors.
tabasco is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:02 PM.