Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > HDR

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 10, 2010, 5:28 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Ancientritual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Columbia, IL
Posts: 347
Default Old Courthouse HDR

This is a 5 exposure HDR. What is unique about this image is the time difference. First 3 shots were taken around sunset (+0, -1, -2). The purpose of this was to retain sky definition. Only one problem. The lights on the courthouse were not on. Thus a 45 minute delay between the first 3 exposures and the last 2. By then the lights on the courthouse dominated the remaining natural light. In fact the sky was by then clear and pretty much black. By overexposing the last 2 shots, the lights on the courthouse were able to contribute to the final image. I have done several of these type of photos and have found Dynamic Range HDR to be the program of choice. Photomatix has problems in the sky area when dealing with such a time difference. There ways around this, but then you are dealing with extra steps just for that photomatix look.
Attached Images
 
Ancientritual is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 11, 2010, 1:53 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fredrikstad - Norway / Europe
Posts: 1,954
Default That's a 'dream-like' scen and I love it.

Very saturated colors and beautiful tones on those blue roofs and the green cupola, together with the varying color-reflections in the buildings behind, they create a special athmosphere of warmth and friendly mood. I would have liked to see some more of those magnificently lit pillars of the courthouse.

Well done!
Walter_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 3:53 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
mtngal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,056
Default

An interesting picture! I agree that Photomatix does have problems sometimes with sunsets, while dphdr doesn't seem to. You've chosen to process this with a fantasy look and it comes off very nicely. I know that others won't like it because it's not "realistic" but I do. It's interesting what decisions we make processing our pictures, I like the ones you made, but if I had been doing it, I wouldn't have used as saturated colors as you did. I suspect that your choice is the wiser one for this particular picture. It is a lovely building, besides.
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 9:05 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Ancientritual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Columbia, IL
Posts: 347
Default

Thank You for your comments. Photography at times can be very subjective and yes at times I tend to favor the art side of things. I remember 25 years ago when my work was accepted for a gallery showing, a wise old man told me, it is not what you think is right, it is what your audience wants. Back then Fuji Velvia and Cibachrome prints dominated the photography world. Both known for there saturation. I guess I have a tendency to carry that over to the digital world.
Ancientritual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 11:11 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2,193
Default

i really like this look as for the shot itself fantastic just a shame you just missed the top of the spiral but thats just me being real petty ..... so take it with a pinch of salt .... as i wish i could produce something as good as this and the time gap you waited i never would have thought of doing something like that so definatly food for thought there ..... excellent
__________________
Nikon D600 / Nikon 50 1.8 G / Nikon 85 1.8 G Always wanting more! MY FLICKR
simple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 11:25 AM   #6
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default

i really like your technique here, waiting for the sun to go down to get the lights on. i think that added alot to this shot over just a standard sunset. very nice.

i would just like to see a bit wider version as well with more of the lit columns, but maybe the constraints of the buildings and your vantage point did not allow this?
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 12:06 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Ancientritual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Columbia, IL
Posts: 347
Default

Again, Thank You for your comments. In order to get the top of the pole, I would have to go vertical. On top of the pole was a waving in the wind american flag. Not a good thing for time exposures. This was shot on a 5 story parking lot building. I drove my car up to the top level and parked right under the cement railing. This allowed me to sit on the hood of my car and place my tripod on top of the railing which was about 20 inches in width. Since I could not extend the tripod, visions of it falling into a crowd below were of utmost concern. Lady luck was smiling at me, because security is becoming a major issue and a stumbling block for a lot of photographers in St. Louis. There seems to be a security guard around every corner trying to make a name for himself. Plus we now have rent a cops on bikes. These guys are always watching you in the downtown area. You tend to be a marked man with a camera in your hand...
Ancientritual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 2:40 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2,193
Default

may i ask how long you have been shooting HDR?
__________________
Nikon D600 / Nikon 50 1.8 G / Nikon 85 1.8 G Always wanting more! MY FLICKR
simple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 3:13 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Ancientritual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Columbia, IL
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simple View Post
may i ask how long you have been shooting HDR?
If you go to mediachance, Dynamic Photo HDR and scroll down to there sample page, you will find samples 2,3, and 4 were done by yours truly. That was 3 years ago. At that time they only had one sample image, so I offered 3 pictures using there product. If memory serves me correct, the pictures were taken at Milstream Gardens, Elephant Rocks, and Silver Mines. All within a 1 1/2 hour drive from St. Louis. Photomatix is a different story. Only been using there product for about 6 months...

Last edited by Ancientritual; Mar 11, 2010 at 5:44 PM.
Ancientritual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2010, 3:23 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2,193
Default

thanks steve
__________________
Nikon D600 / Nikon 50 1.8 G / Nikon 85 1.8 G Always wanting more! MY FLICKR
simple is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:02 AM.