Steve'sDigicams

polishedstaple · Dec 12, 2006, 2:10 PM

I still haven't made up my mind of which hybrid to get. I tried the pure digital one and it was fairly good. However, I want quality that is good enough to play full screen without become pixilated. Does this require a CCD sensor camera instead of a CMOS? Why do these companies say VGA quality if I really can't play back full screen without it looking nasty?

Thanks!

Old HACer · Dec 12, 2006, 4:02 PM

Are you talking about playback on a PC or a TV? If a PC, did you try setting the resolution of the monitor down to 640x480?

polishedstaple · Dec 12, 2006, 4:11 PM

Is that what I have to do to show a full screen movie? That doesn't sound convenient. Why is it that I can play DVDs "full screen" on my Mac and they don't look pixilated and grainy? Do I need to buy an HD camera to accomplish this? Or am I just not seeing something?

Thanks!

fishycomics · Dec 12, 2006, 4:45 PM

ha ha ha

you are notdoing something correctly or that pure digital one has no specs saying its res size

640x480 is the correct size while dvd may be at 540 x720 may be right or wrong sorry.

ccd is a more exspensive chip or sensor , and requires space, while cmos is electronic.

polishedstaple · Dec 12, 2006, 5:59 PM

So is there a hybrid that you know of that does use a CCD sensor? I want the best quality I can get, and I need it to be in a hybrid.

Thanks.

fishycomics · Dec 12, 2006, 6:16 PM

http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/v...mp;forum_id=92

here is a person X he wants to get rid of one that's a start

rgvcam · Dec 12, 2006, 6:23 PM

The only difference between a CCD and CMOS is that a CCD generally has better low light ability and hence less noisy in those conditions otherwise it shoudn't affect how pixellated it may look. This has more to do with how good the devices compression is. 640x480 should be more than adequate for a TV as this is the same resolution as a regular MiniDV camcorder.

Also how big a TV are we on about? A regular 27" TV or a large projection TV?

You also do not need to change the resolution of your PC as it will automatically resize it to the display. It has more to do with actual display size rather than how many pixels it has. My laptop is 1680 x 1050 and the videos from my Sanyo C40 look quite good to me fullscreen.

sgspirit · Dec 12, 2006, 9:59 PM

I don't think any of the cameras using MPEG4 are capable of clear, detailed video at tv screen size. You have to find something not using compression, which of course means much larger files, which eat up memory and bog down your computer. Full screen "full" detail awaits either more powerful compression software, or increased bandwidth in the sensor/camera data rate, increased memory capacity, more powerful computers etc.

I have found that there is a big difference in image quality between tv's, with the more expensive ones making the MPEG4 playback look better.

I don't think choosing between CCD and CMOS sensors make any significant difference in this regard. I have two very different CCD cameras at the moment, and one is much less "noisy" in dim light than the other. Any difference in detail quality can be equated to the amount of compression being done.

Good lighting and careful technique can yield results that can be good enough for me. But I'd like to see the compression turned down now that higher capacity memory cards can be used.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Steve'sDigicams

Recent Camera Reviews

Most Active Forums

Most Popular Deals

Latest Feature Articles

Dec 12, 2006, 2:10 PM	#1
polishedstaple Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 8	I still haven't made up my mind of which hybrid to get. I tried the pure digital one and it was fairly good. However, I want quality that is good enough to play full screen without become pixilated. Does this require a CCD sensor camera instead of a CMOS? Why do these companies say VGA quality if I really can't play back full screen without it looking nasty? Thanks!

Dec 12, 2006, 4:02 PM	#2
Old HACer Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 415	Are you talking about playback on a PC or a TV? If a PC, did you try setting the resolution of the monitor down to 640x480?

Dec 12, 2006, 4:11 PM	#3
polishedstaple Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 8	Is that what I have to do to show a full screen movie? That doesn't sound convenient. Why is it that I can play DVDs "full screen" on my Mac and they don't look pixilated and grainy? Do I need to buy an HD camera to accomplish this? Or am I just not seeing something? Thanks!

Dec 12, 2006, 4:45 PM	#4
fishycomics Moderator Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: NYC NY Posts: 9,683	ha ha ha you are notdoing something correctly or that pure digital one has no specs saying its res size 640x480 is the correct size while dvd may be at 540 x720 may be right or wrong sorry. ccd is a more exspensive chip or sensor , and requires space, while cmos is electronic.

Dec 12, 2006, 5:59 PM	#5
polishedstaple Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 8	So is there a hybrid that you know of that does use a CCD sensor? I want the best quality I can get, and I need it to be in a hybrid. Thanks.

Dec 12, 2006, 6:16 PM	#6
fishycomics Moderator Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: NYC NY Posts: 9,683	http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/v...mp;forum_id=92 here is a person X he wants to get rid of one that's a start

Dec 12, 2006, 6:23 PM	#7
rgvcam Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 2,084	The only difference between a CCD and CMOS is that a CCD generally has better low light ability and hence less noisy in those conditions otherwise it shoudn't affect how pixellated it may look. This has more to do with how good the devices compression is. 640x480 should be more than adequate for a TV as this is the same resolution as a regular MiniDV camcorder. Also how big a TV are we on about? A regular 27" TV or a large projection TV? You also do not need to change the resolution of your PC as it will automatically resize it to the display. It has more to do with actual display size rather than how many pixels it has. My laptop is 1680 x 1050 and the videos from my Sanyo C40 look quite good to me fullscreen.

Dec 12, 2006, 9:59 PM	#8
sgspirit Moderator Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 887	I don't think any of the cameras using MPEG4 are capable of clear, detailed video at tv screen size. You have to find something not using compression, which of course means much larger files, which eat up memory and bog down your computer. Full screen "full" detail awaits either more powerful compression software, or increased bandwidth in the sensor/camera data rate, increased memory capacity, more powerful computers etc. I have found that there is a big difference in image quality between tv's, with the more expensive ones making the MPEG4 playback look better. I don't think choosing between CCD and CMOS sensors make any significant difference in this regard. I have two very different CCD cameras at the moment, and one is much less "noisy" in dim light than the other. Any difference in detail quality can be equated to the amount of compression being done. Good lighting and careful technique can yield results that can be good enough for me. But I'd like to see the compression turned down now that higher capacity memory cards can be used.