|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Feb 13, 2009, 7:26 PM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 29
|
This software at US$30 looks to be a budget solution to maintaining HD quality from camera to PC, editing, then uploading to Youtube or similar. Reading the Quicktime material it seems that the editing features are fairly basic but what is good is that it appears to be a complete solution from camera to the final destination and use. A one stop shop.
So the big question, what are the experiences with Quicktime Pro? Is it a one stop shop solution? If its relevant my camera is a Digilife which comes with Arcsoft software which is rubbish to use and does not do everything anyway. PC runs Windows XP. |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2009, 12:58 AM
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 29
|
Its surprising that apparently noone knows anything about Pro, seeing that it seems to be so widely used :O
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2009, 2:18 PM
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 14
|
I think you'll find that everyone shuns QT for it's pitiful quality (personal opinion). Try Presto. I've used it briefly and it gave exellent HD to xvid AVI conversion and the editor seems comprhensive and good.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 26, 2009, 1:48 PM
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,153
|
I have Quicktime Pro and love it. I have both Macs and Windows PCs. I use it on both.
|
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:14 PM.
