Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 25, 2006, 12:27 AM   #1
reiluke's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 52

Hmm i dont know if it belongs to Hybrid but the Video quality is ++++

* Carl Zeiss Optics: Vario-Tessar glass lens
* Matrix, 4.5х5.5 мм, CMOS, 3.2 megapixel (2048x1536)
* Shutter speed: Mechanical shutter: 1/2400~1/3 s
* Macro focus distance 30 cm (macro @ Wide) 10 cm (macro @ Middle to Tele)
* Focus range 10 cm ~ infinity
* Focal length 4.5 mm (Wide) /12.4 mm (Tele) 34.25 - 94.1 mm(35mm equiv.)
* Still image file format: JPEG/EXIF
* Auto focus
* White balance: automatic, sunny, cloudy, incandescent, fluorescent
* Exposure compensation: +1 ~ -1EV at 0.5 step
* Scene: automatic, user, close-up, landscape, night, night portray
* Color tone: normal, sepia, black & white, negative
* Zoom (optical/digital) 3x / up to 20x

heres sample vids


reiluke is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Sep 25, 2006, 6:59 AM   #2
fishycomics's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC NY
Posts: 9,684

I do not mind as there is realy no other place to talk about a hybrid with multiple tasks.

A moderator once wanted to keep things real low keyed and only allowed a hybrid Under 199.99 and it had to be a Mustek if it was aiptek it was accepted, nothing Else.

Wonder what ever happened to that person?

The samsung ws it , Sorry I have to dig up the video from the 2004,2005 expo show.

camera came in with a strong bang and went out without a notice discontinued by sprint.

I use my cell just for calls Lol. I place a pic on a phone number, and try t okeep a certain ring for that individual.

I preferre a hybrid as it is ment for those Purposes. I can easily replace a hybrid , if it breaks, I cannot afford to replace a cellphone if it gets lost ,stolen or dropped. a highway rrobbery of Overpricing. the cell looks like a 500.00 usc pric and hate to see it abused.
fishycomics is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 25, 2006, 9:40 AM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,084

Try nearer $800! It seems the moment you add cellphone functionality you can add at least $200 to the equivalent hybrid device LOL

I think the definition of a hybrid for the purposes of this forum should be a device in which the camera functions ie video and still images are the main purpose of the device. After all this is a camera website. The Nokia N93 is really a cellphone first, and video camera second. It could also be classed as a PDA. There is well known website for Cellphone Devices called at www.howardforums.com

Otherwise a lot of cellphones would soon come under this category since many now do video, photos and mp3's although most not as good quality as the hybrids from Aiptek, Mustek etc.

I love these symbian phones as I myself have a Nokia 6600. While not as well specified as the N93, I use it it a lot to take photos and small videos of my son as I always have it with me. The problem, as fishycomics said, is that they can too expensive to replace than a cheap hybrid from Aiptek etc.!
rgvcam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 25, 2006, 11:02 AM   #4
fishycomics's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC NY
Posts: 9,684

Thank you as now this topic is closed
fishycomics is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:22 PM.