Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Hybrid Still/Movie/MP3 Digicams

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 1, 2009, 11:08 AM   #11
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 38
Default

in the stills comparison the samsung is the upper , right ?
i think kodak stills are better.
i wish you post the raw photos without resizing
bollity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2009, 12:38 PM   #12
Moderator
 
fishycomics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC NY
Posts: 9,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bollity View Post
in the stills comparison the samsung is the upper , right ?
i think kodak stills are better.
i wish you post the raw photos without resizing
In th stills it is marked for the Samsung. I added kodak in. only the no.1 for now.

I as well added the direct files for no. 01

normally with imageshack.us you click the picture, and full size on their site. it did not work LOL.

go back and grab the first one's if interested , enjoy
fishycomics is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2009, 1:09 PM   #13
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 38
Default

i have seen the raw stills
samsung have a noticeable noise when viewed in original size but have more details than kodak (look at the far trees). kodak is more bright and better colors
i vote for kodak here.
bollity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2009, 1:15 PM   #14
Moderator
 
fishycomics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC NY
Posts: 9,621
Default

the question we need to truely know of Samsung, and kodak. orginal megapixal the cam is shooting at.
fishycomics is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 AM.