|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
Here is another sunset for you, also taken with the Kodak Z-612. As often happens in this area, when we have little or no wind, a fog bank had begun to form, creating a very nice effect.
Sarah |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,936
|
![]()
Great shot Sarah !
![]() Was that horizon / fog as seen are perked up via Adobe ? Picture could be part of the next King Kong remake where the ship is looking for "Skull Island", home of Mr. K. Kong Esq. BiLL :| |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
The fog bank is exactly as seen. No photoshoping on the fog bank. The backlighting from the sunset make it appearreally gray white in color.
Sarah |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 742
|
![]()
Different and well captured.
Looks otherworldly to me. Sc-fi. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,704
|
![]()
Wow very special, I like this picture
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 115
|
![]()
Looks very Sci-Fi,...oh Oregan, that's near the moon right...:-)
Terrific photo, the islands with the fog skimming over the water really set this shot off.. Thanks Ron |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 194
|
![]()
Wow, just Wow!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,379
|
![]()
Superb picture!
Just out of curiosity, but why does the exit info say that it was taken with a Nikon E5400? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
Inn-
It was taken with a Kodak Z-612. Sarah |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,379
|
![]()
I saw that, I was wondering why the exif was wrong... I'm not sure how exactly the exif is embedded and I was wondering what would cause it to be wrong like that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|