|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 30
|
![]()
I took these from my front yard a few days ago. I used my Kodak dx7590 at 1.8mp.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 30
|
![]()
Another
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 30
|
![]()
And again
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 30
|
![]()
Last one
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 451
|
![]()
great shots there!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 122
|
![]()
Awesome photos! I like #1 and #3 the best..especially in #3 where the house at the bottom is like a silohuette.
Dani |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,896
|
![]()
Nice shots, Mike....just curious- why the 1.8mp setting?
Dan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,936
|
![]()
I am curious about the 1.8mp too!
Sounds like driving a race car with the brakes on. BiLL :? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 30
|
![]()
1.8mp? I'd last used the camera to take some shots for a website that severly restricts size. I forgot to change the settings.
Since this site limits us to 250K does it really matter? Not a smart ass ?, but since I wasn't going to make any prints out of these does it make a big difference? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
|
![]()
Not to me. I usually post as much info on the photo as possible, At 1.8 some of that is left out or at least diminished. No. 1 is a great shot no matter what mp you had it on!
Dawg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|