|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Imaging-Resource.com posted their review of the P712. Overall I think it was a very favorable
![]() http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/P712/P712A.HTM |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 483
|
![]()
No surprises... good design and feel (ergonomics), good speed, good IS, very good LCD, too many buttons, poor low light performance, OK but less than spectacular picture quality, noisy at higher ISO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,379
|
![]()
It's funny, they complain about too many buttons and then complain that there aren't enough buttons...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
It is also interesting that this review makes a rather large deal about the P-712 being slow to focus, especially in low light at long zoom. That was also my complaint about the P-850. However, after 2 weeks+ of use with the Z-612 I have not found that to be a problem.
MT/Sarah |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|