|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,896
|
![]()
Like #3...I gotta agree with Dawg, out of focus on the others.....Morag, if you're after detail ( as in craters) try a faster shutter. I know it looks stationary when we're shooting it, but remember the moon is moving and sois the earth. Line up the moon in your brackets, walk away for a few minutes, and it won't even be close.
Dan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 820
|
![]()
En, I shot them in high quality Jpegs, I only posted them on the internet with low quality.
As for Dawg and Faciabrut, I did in fact have a good focus, but the moon was actually a lot dimmer than my pictures show, so I was using 1/4 to 1/20 shutter speed mostly, the first two got some image blur (not surprising seeing as my focal length with digi-zoom was a 2400mm equivalent!) En121 wrote: Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 541
|
![]()
I understand that. But, why do you need to make them low quality? When you open them and edit them, if you're going to save as a JPEG, always save as a 100% quality JPEG.
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
|
![]()
It moves so much on me between shots that I'm constantly having to re-align the camera just before shooting. LOL
Dawg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 820
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
|
![]()
Morag..I resize mine to 800X600 and try to keep the file size at around 230kb. Gives a good photo and as far as someone stealing mine I'd be flattered if they did....Then my lawyer and I would slap a law suit on them to get the money....Just kidding. LOLOL
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 541
|
![]()
Hehe, my routine is too resize to 800x600, then save as 100% jpeg, and, put them on photobucket. :3
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
|
![]()
The thing is though that if you don't reduce the KB's a bit then Photobucket will do it for you and they don't use a progressive compression! Or at least that was the way they did it when I first got an account there!
Dawg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 541
|
![]()
Well, they're usually under 1mb. Because of the pixel size. Its just fine. Justy remember to go into your photobucket settings and change it 1024kb. :3
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 820
|
![]()
Well, thats all irrelevant to me, the point is, I don't want high quality versions of my shots widely available on the internet. I know they arn't great but I want to sell those someday! And I don't want anyone thinking Steves Digicams is a free photo site!:blah:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|