|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 750
|
![]()
1st shot at no zoom
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 750
|
![]()
2nd shot at 12x
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 750
|
![]()
3rd shot at full throttle. incl optical and digital
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 742
|
![]()
No visible noise. Digital zoom looks much better than it should. Too bad there is no Exif info.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 742
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 742
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 541
|
![]()
That might be because these shots are very low quality JPEG's.
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 750
|
![]()
En121, I took these strictly as a experiment to minimum to maximum zoom results.
How did you determine that the pictures were "very low quality" jpeg's? I see no pixelation unless I magnify them further. Thanks for the imput everyone. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 541
|
![]()
And you did a good job. Well, for my eyes its easy to tell. Its also easy to tell by how small the files are. :3
Anyway, can't wait to see some more of your P712 shots! ^^ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
|
![]()
Looks good enough to me! Remember it's not so much what we like, it's how happy are you with the shot! Some are pickier than others and will find someting wrong with most everything you or I could shoot. Just do it as well as you wish to and you'll be happy! Nice ones to me.
Dawg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|