Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Kodak

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 16, 2008, 2:11 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 742
Default

http://instapun.exposuremanager.com/g/nikon_vs_kodak

I don't believe the pics are direct comparisons but the Z1085 came out well. In the bar pic the Z1085 had to deal with a more complex lighting scheme.
domang is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Apr 16, 2008, 5:24 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

domang-

Considering the bar photo was taken at ISO 3200, and the diverse lighting conditions, the Z-1085 did a good job.

Sarah Joyce
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2008, 10:08 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 2,093
Default

mtclimber wrote:
Quote:
domang-

Considering the bar photo was taken at ISO 3200, and the diverse lighting conditions, the Z-1085 did a good job.

Sarah Joyce
I agree. The gross difference between the photos is that the exposure on the Nikon was biased toward the highlights and the Kodak biased toward the shadows every case. I'd have liked to see the same series but with the mid-tones held constant.
ac.smith is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:16 AM.