Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Kodak

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 2, 2004, 9:29 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5
Default

I have been looking at the DX 7630 and DX7440, after reading your opinions and doing research online, I went to Best Buy to try them both out. What I found when comparing pictures of a person from the same printer (you can print samples at Best Buy) is that the DX7630 overexposes and washes out a person when you are standing about 5 ft from them. However, the background looks nice and bright. On the other hand, the DX7440 tends to have a little better skin tone on the person without washing them out, but as many people have stated, the background colors are not quite as bright. So I am wondering given that, which is the better way to go with a flash? a Brigher flash that washes out your subject or a dimmer flash that darkens your background. I am new to photography, so I don't know how to control all the stuff and I am really looking for a point and shoot in auto or preprogrammed modes. I also set the camera to "party mode" for indoor shots and got the same results. When I turned the flash off on both cameras, there were shadows under the chin, but the 7630 continued to have a brighter overall picture. Any ideas on which flash is better or more ideal?

Thanks again!

Karen
klwilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 2, 2004, 4:59 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
brianhare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 969
Default

If you overexpose, valuable detail is lost,,if you have the choice always go under,not too much though,,you can always lighten the shot in a photo-editing suite.....



Brian
brianhare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2004, 5:25 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
photosbyvito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,710
Default

you can always turn the flash down a stop...

but underexposing normally is better, easier to fix in photoshop..

Vito
photosbyvito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2004, 6:34 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 30
Default

Considering the lighting at BB, I dont know if I would completely judge a camera by the pictures it takes there. Its usually pretty harsh, and not the kind of lighting you would use in your home
gruss is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:29 AM.