Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Kodak

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 29, 2005, 10:41 AM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4

I've set up this form in order to compare the pros & cons of the new "deck of card" sized cameras in the $400 price range w/5 mega pixels, that have come out in the past 6 months. Specifically I'm interested in comparing Kodak v550, Sony Cyber-shot T33, Nikon Coolpix S1 and the Canon Powershot SD400.

I realize that the majority of these cameras will be used by people more interested in capturing a moment at a bar than framing that perfect shot for a calendar. However, these cameras do have the ability to take ‘calendar' quality photos as well as their user-friendly versatility in taking shots, and it's these features that I'm most interested in.

Currently I'm leaning towards the Kodak v550 b/c it has both the 2.5" screen, a view finder, 30fps video, and 20 different shot modes. The above mentioned cameras do not have one or more of these features.

Despite these differences, what camera produces the best quality photos? Fastest shutter speed? Most reliable? Most user friendly? Etc.

Essentially, of the above 4 cameras what do people recommend and why?
HorizonBound is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 30, 2005, 6:25 AM   #2
Senior Member
DGehman's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 319

You might want to ask this in the forum, Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Somebody there might have actual experience with more than one.

Kodak has good service... don't know anytlhing about the service record for Sony, Nikon or Canon. Kodak video is not the strong point of Kodak's cameras, and the shot modes are (at the moment, anyway) under documented, so you'll have to experiment to see what each one automates and/or selects. I've used the shot modes maybe twice -- in fact, I pretty much forgot about them until you mentioned them.

Kodak color harks back to the color-heightened Kodachrome / Ektachrome days, so you get pictures with that punchy, National Geographic look to them. Colors are a bit on the warm side. Some object to this -- along with most, I like it. And I've found the Kodak interface very easy.

For photo quality, compare full size example photos of the major reviews (here at Steve's, Digital Camera Resource, Digital Photography review and so on). Some complain about Kodak's aggressive compression, but I've seen objectionable JPEG artifacts only on a few picture of mine, though I don't do either bars or calendars.

DGehman is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.