Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 13, 2004, 12:39 PM   #1
Senior Member
Catbells's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 874

Does the A200 or A2 suffer from problems with focusing in low light.Does it cope so well that it does not need a AF assist lamp.

I am curious to know as I've read a lot about problems on the Nikon CP8800 with it's less than satisfactory AF assist lamp.
Catbells is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 13, 2004, 1:42 PM   #2
Senior Member
slipe's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
Posts: 4,036

According to the Megapixel review the A200 has more focus problems than the A2. This was just at telephoto and not specifically related to low light focus. I would wait for more reviews before considering one. The A200 doesn't have the high quality EVF of the A2, and Megapixel thinks the quality isn't high enough for manual focus. If you wait until after Christmas I think the A200 will come down nicely in price – it was designed to be a cheaper camera.

On the A2:
"The autofocus system worked well in conditions of low ambient light despite the absence of a focus-assist lamp"

Dave at Imaging Resource:
"In addition to its excellent low-light capture ability, the A2's electronic viewfinder is usable at light levels down to and even somewhat below the 1/16 foot-candle limit of my test, and its autofocus system can actually focus at light levels that low, despite the camera's lack of an autofocus-assist light. (NOTE though, that with any digicam capable of really low-light focusing like this, you need to have the camera absolutely rigidly mounted, as any camera shake will keep the camera from focusing altogether.)"

"On the negative side, it seems that when focusing at telephoto settings, the A200 is slower to focus than the A2."

"Similarly, when set to manual mode, focusing is more difficult than it is with the A2 because of the lower definition EVF.

slipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2004, 5:20 PM   #3
Junior Member
Wintermist's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4

After having my A200 for about 4 days now, the AF isn't that bad. The only time the AF hunts is at full tele in say the dark corner of a room, and how much you'd used 200mm at that point I don't know, not often. At wide angles the AF is fine and in full daylight it's very quick to focus and also accurate. I think it's getting a bad rap becasue people are doing a lot of test shots but in real world shot it seems to be just fine. As a side note the image quality is very good, I am impressed, not as good as my 20d but very close in overall quality and sharpness, Minolta got that right on.
Wintermist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 2005, 1:31 AM   #4
DeanB's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 96

To date, the only known post on this site by an A200 OWNER (see post directly above):shock:

Wintermist ...please come-back and tell us more!:bye:
DeanB is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:37 PM.