|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Jan 21, 2005, 11:33 PM
|
#21 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5
|
Hi!
New to this forum and this camera. Just got it on Thursday. Am still feeling my way around. Helleborus orientalis in my backyard this AM. 2448 x 3264, Extra Fine, ISO 100, Handheld, no flash, Telphoto Macro. All other settings Auto. Original image is around 3 MB. Resized in IrfanView to 1024x768, and resampled to fit the size limits. |
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2005, 5:19 AM
|
#22 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 874
|
queson wrote:
Quote:
The humped back sign here 'warns' of a section of the road that has been raised - like a 'sleeping policemen' to cause traffic to slow down as they cross. Sleeping policeman - just in case some one doesn't know - is a short section raised section of road - varies in length between 2 feet and 6 feet - to slow down traffic in built up areas. There was an incident quite recently here in the UK by where a resident tired of the noise created by traffic slowing down & revving of engines, leveled the road using a JCB. Nice pictures from gogogo5& ejellest; did you use any in camera enhancing or post processing to sharpen the images or were they straight out the camera. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2005, 6:24 AM
|
#23 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6
|
Hi Catbells - thanks for your feedback on our pics. Your question about post-processing has reminded me that I forgot to include that all photos had the Vivid colour mode selected.
Other than that, all photos are straight from camera and resized in Elements 3 using Bicubic Sharpening to 800x600. -gogogo5 |
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2005, 1:57 PM
|
#24 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5
|
>did you use any in camera enhancing or post processing to sharpen the images?
Aside from the settings I mention all the camera settings are at default. Camera Sharpness is set to "Normal". I didn't do any filtering or post processing, aside than resize to 1024x768 and save as "progressive jpeg" at about 95% quality in IrfanView. From the EXIF data, the "FNumber" was 3.5 and "ExposureTime" was 1/15 seconds. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2005, 2:37 PM
|
#25 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6
|
Telephoto macro; 1/15 sec; handheld? Wow.
I'm impressed. I know it's not the sharpest picture taken (note: I have not examined it with my glasses yet. Yes, it does make a difference for me). But still, that is impressive. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2005, 8:13 PM
|
#26 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5
|
Dripping Pine Sap, How Romantic
For some reason I had a hard time getting the camera to focus on this one. Also, I had to reduce the jpeg quality pretty seriously in photoshop to get it small enough to upload. No other post processing. DateTime - 2005:01:22 16:28:59 ExposureTime - 1/320 seconds FNumber - 5.00 ISOSpeedRatings - 50 FocalLength - 44.00 mm ExposureMode - Auto WhiteBalance - Auto FocalLengthIn35mmFilm - 171 mm SceneCaptureType - Standard GainControl - None Contrast - Normal Saturation - Normal Sharpness - Normal SubjectDistanceRange - Macro |
|
|
|
|
Jan 23, 2005, 11:17 AM
|
#27 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4
|
A200 is great camera for newbie like me.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 23, 2005, 11:19 AM
|
#28 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4
|
Pic 2
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 23, 2005, 11:20 AM
|
#29 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4
|
pic 3
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 23, 2005, 11:22 AM
|
#30 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4
|
pic 4
|
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:14 PM.
