|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 51
|
![]()
Hi there,
try this: http://www.nikmultimedia.com/index/usa/entry.php There are some useful informations about sharpening as well as some free demos (PS-or compatible plug- ins, I´m afraid) Ciao, Wolfie ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 14
|
![]() Quote:
I didn't know that the print lab uses info of the camera other then the visual file… Before I bought the camera I sent to the print lab a few pictures I downloaded from the internet , and I was totally blown away by the results, the quality was amazing !, far better then what I can get from my Epson home photo printer , and also the price per print is cheaper when considering the price of high quality photopapar and ink needed for high rez prints. I sent last week 14 shots to be printed on a glossy 20cm X 30cm paper , I included in the prints also processed and just from the card pictures , also of the same picture so I can see what is the difference. I still did not receive it (the man from the lab called and told me they don't have glossy paper of this size and that it will take him time to order) but when I get the prints I will know better what to expect… On my monitor the pictures, if viewed sharpened and resized to fit the screen , they does look better. But if I see them stretched to the pixels size , the sharpening looks like noise , and I loose the fines of small details. I also asked the print lab for one print on mat paper to see if that affects the quality. Btw: since I bought a tripod and started using it , my shots got better and sharper for my still life- landscapes photos. Even the moon came out right , here I sharpened it , it looks better more embossed , but it also , now looks flatter and less as the ball that it is, which is worse. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|