|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
Posts: 4,036
|
![]() Quote:
The G400 evidently has a more sophisticated focus system but a very weak flash. Otherwise I think they are pretty much the same except for the Mp. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 15
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 15
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 546
|
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 15
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Savannah, GA (USA)
Posts: 22,378
|
![]() Quote:
The full manual mode uses the camera's metering so that you can see how your settings impact exposure (-2.0 to +2.0 in 0.3 EV increments). So, it's quick and easy to use. You have a choice of two apertures (with the values changing depending on focal length), with very fine control of shutter speed. In any event, since the camera only has two real apertures (with the values changing depending on focal length), Shutter Priority would not be practical (unless implemented like Nikon did in the Coolpix 950, which only had 3 "real" apertures). Nikon simply varied ISO speed to simulate having more apertures in Shutter Priority Mode (most people don't realize that they did it that way before the Coolpix 990). Although Konica did add Aperture Priority to the newer KD-420z (a.k.a., G400), it's somewhat crippled, too (still only two real apertures). The G400 does get some scene modes (but they are of limited value because of the Aperture limitation). In any event, due to the tremendous DOF you get with the tiny sensors and lenses in these models, you really don't need more than two apertures in most conditions. About the only time I go to full manual is for macros (where you have greater control of DOF because of your distance to the subject), or night shots (for long exposures). I've found the G500 to be plenty flexible enough for my shooting needs though (and it takes terrific pics). Quote:
The G500 review had the opposite conclusion (without any hybrid focus system): "Although it's not equipped with a focus-assist lamp, the G500 autofocus system worked surprisingly well in conditions of low ambient light, as did LCD viewfinder" KM did come out with a firmware upgrade recently for the G400, but I don't know if the issues with the Hybrid Focus System accuracy were addressed or not. The G400 menu system is quite a bit different compared to the older G500, too. Konica must have decided to start with a relatively clean sheet of paper from a firmware design perspective (although there are some similiarities with the menu choices). There are pros and cons to both models. Personally, I wouldn't trade my KD-510z (G500) for a G400 (image quality, flash range, etc.). The G400 is smaller and faster (startup time, focus time in good light), and does have more features. So, some users may find it to be a better fit. For my needs, I would not trade my KD-510z (G500) for any other pocketable camera on the market. If you want to see some albums with the same subjects from both cameras, you'll find them here: G400 (multiple pages from this model -- go through each page to see all of the photos): http://galleriet.akamera.no/albur09 KD-510z/G500 versus Multiple Cameras in these (you'll see some of the same scenes as in the above G400 album, if you look through the below album links). Note that you can click on a thumbnail to see a large photo, then click on the large photo to see the original. http://galleriet.akamera.no/albuq42 http://galleriet.akamera.no/albuq43 http://galleriet.akamera.no/albuq44 http://galleriet.akamera.no/albuq45 http://galleriet.akamera.no/albuq46 You can see some photos from camera in my pbase.com album at http://www.pbase.com/jcockfield/konica_kd510z You'll also find links to my user review (which goes into the G500 features in great detail). |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 546
|
![]() Quote:
I've never had a print made that I shot in that super high-speed mode, so I couldn't tell you how they look. With all the custom settings you can use on the Z1, I'm usaually able to get great action shots with the standard drive mode at full res. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 47
|
![]()
In my opinion, I think that Z2 or A2 are too large for travel use ! In my situation, I choose F200 since the size is small so I can store it on my belt-bag easily ! Unless you need a high zoom power DC, otherwise, I won't recommend ! Try to consider G400 or Canon A70 or A80, these DCs are not really large and have manual controls !
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 21
|
![]()
For the record, I have a 1.3 mp cam (el cheapo $30 one) and 3x5s look pretty good, 4x6s passible, and 5x7s are ok from over a foot away.
Not a lot of resolution but you can get the job done. I'm looking at a |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|