|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,458
|
![]()
Just thought I'd share this ridiculously large pano. At full rez, it would run about 180 inches. ( if I had a printer that could handle the task... and a wall. :-)) Needless to say, downsizing for the web knocked some punch out of it.
I do appreciate any and all comments. Tom, on Point Pelee, Canada http://tomoverton.myphotoalbum.com |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,458
|
![]()
Here's a slightly different, smaller series.
Tom, on Point Pelee, Canada http://tomoverton.myphotoalbum.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,074
|
![]()
So beautiful! I like the first one better though, more grass and less sky. I love the moon in the distant sky. So gett a bigger printer then:lol:
Rose |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,663
|
![]()
Nice view, I like the first one the best.
What kind of printer do you have? I've printed 7x27" on roll paper on my Epson R800 and the results look fantastic (the size was chosen to fit inside a 10x30" readymade frame, as custom frames are expensive here). I find it's really hard to evaluate panoramas on computer screens, or even on A4, it's only when it's printed at "full height" that they really start to shine. Of course with an A3+ R1800 I could print my panoramas even larger: seems like there's always better kit just round the corner, sigh...:? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|