Steve'sDigicams

geoffs · Aug 24, 2004, 12:26 AM

Julie, this photo was originally taken in early June and therefore was late spring in our hemisphere. If I remember correctly, it was late afternoon, probably around 4 or 4:30 (as you mentioned) and the sun would have been setting about 8:30 or so around that time of year.

ImKayd1 · Aug 24, 2004, 1:56 AM

Your capture of the light here isoutstanding. This is definately one to be framed and

hung on the wall.

Suzan

geoffs · Aug 24, 2004, 2:01 AM

Thanks, Suzan!

I intend to do just what you say, printing it out in 13"x19" format on my Canon i9900 which will definitely do it justice. I'll have to do a proper NeatImage'ing of it first to rid it of a bit of noise that you can see in the sky areas.

photosbyvito · Aug 24, 2004, 10:15 AM

h/o there geoffs...

i think the noise adds to it...

before you print it "noiseless" post it here, please....i'd like to see it

Vito

geoffs · Aug 24, 2004, 8:57 PM

Vito, I'llpost the version I'm going to print before I do any noise reduction on it. However, the effects of my PS post-processing tends to accentuate the film grain from the slide scans of the original image so I think NR will be necessary.

Sure, some noise adds to the mood of the shot but too much will ruin it for the viewers.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Steve'sDigicams

Recent Camera Reviews

Most Active Forums

Most Popular Deals

Latest Feature Articles

Aug 24, 2004, 12:26 AM	#11
geoffs Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 2,025	Julie, this photo was originally taken in early June and therefore was late spring in our hemisphere. If I remember correctly, it was late afternoon, probably around 4 or 4:30 (as you mentioned) and the sun would have been setting about 8:30 or so around that time of year.

Aug 24, 2004, 1:56 AM	#12
ImKayd1 Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 1,785	Your capture of the light here isoutstanding. This is definately one to be framed and hung on the wall. Suzan

Aug 24, 2004, 2:01 AM	#13
geoffs Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 2,025	Thanks, Suzan! I intend to do just what you say, printing it out in 13"x19" format on my Canon i9900 which will definitely do it justice. I'll have to do a proper NeatImage'ing of it first to rid it of a bit of noise that you can see in the sky areas.

Aug 24, 2004, 10:15 AM	#14
photosbyvito Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 5,710	h/o there geoffs... i think the noise adds to it... before you print it "noiseless" post it here, please....i'd like to see it Vito

Aug 24, 2004, 8:57 PM	#15
geoffs Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 2,025	Vito, I'llpost the version I'm going to print before I do any noise reduction on it. However, the effects of my PS post-processing tends to accentuate the film grain from the slide scans of the original image so I think NR will be necessary. Sure, some noise adds to the mood of the shot but too much will ruin it for the viewers.