Steve'sDigicams

john101 · May 13, 2003, 6:06 AM

blueridge in the back.

steve6 · May 13, 2003, 1:03 PM

Well, erm, boring really. Nothing of any real interest in it.

Nice enough place though.

Don't worry good pics are few and far between most of mine are like that, just a record of where I've been - interesting to you but to no one else.

john101 · May 13, 2003, 6:46 PM

thanks steave6 thats why i post to get comments. its were i live. posted it cause the shadows and sunlight . didnt mess with it in edit. ive got a lot to learn and you guys are great help.
john101

Klaus DK · May 14, 2003, 2:15 AM

I agree with Steve on this one. Boring.
It's easy to forget the "eyecatcher", cause our eyes sees different than the lens, right ?! It may be beautyful to look at - but looks like sh.. on a photograph.

stefank · May 21, 2003, 1:29 PM

yep I'm also with Steve and Klaus on this one.

A pleasant enough record of somewhere you've been but of no interest to anyone else.

As Klaus touches on it may well have looked better/more interesting "in the flesh" but as a photo it has nothing.

Also like Steve says I take loads like this too - so you're in good company

Stef

LCohen · May 21, 2003, 2:36 PM

A black and white version of this. With the green channel choked. Would perhaps have given some drama.

Am I way out of line or do you agree?

john101 · May 21, 2003, 4:03 PM

yep i got bored with it to so i changed it. :roll:
i'm really new at this edit stuff.

LCohen · May 21, 2003, 4:13 PM

better

. Though I am not a fan of these very obvious editings

.

If you have photoshop you could use the channel mixer, and cut down on the green and make a monochrome image there. That would give a very dark ground (nice in my eyes).

May 13, 2003, 6:06 AM	#1
john101 Member Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 31	mountain in the morning blueridge in the back.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Steve'sDigicams

Recent Camera Reviews

Most Active Forums

Most Popular Deals

Latest Feature Articles

May 13, 2003, 1:03 PM	#2
steve6 Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 1,050	Well, erm, boring really. Nothing of any real interest in it. Nice enough place though. Don't worry good pics are few and far between most of mine are like that, just a record of where I've been - interesting to you but to no one else.

May 13, 2003, 6:46 PM	#3
john101 Member Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 31	thanks steave6 thats why i post to get comments. its were i live. posted it cause the shadows and sunlight . didnt mess with it in edit. ive got a lot to learn and you guys are great help. john101

May 14, 2003, 2:15 AM	#4
Klaus DK Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 2,216	I agree with Steve on this one. Boring. It's easy to forget the "eyecatcher", cause our eyes sees different than the lens, right ?! It may be beautyful to look at - but looks like sh.. on a photograph.

May 21, 2003, 1:29 PM	#5
stefank Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 282	yep I'm also with Steve and Klaus on this one. A pleasant enough record of somewhere you've been but of no interest to anyone else. As Klaus touches on it may well have looked better/more interesting "in the flesh" but as a photo it has nothing. Also like Steve says I take loads like this too - so you're in good company Stef

May 21, 2003, 2:36 PM	#6
LCohen Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 251	A black and white version of this. With the green channel choked. Would perhaps have given some drama. Am I way out of line or do you agree?

May 21, 2003, 4:03 PM	#7
john101 Member Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 31	yep i got bored with it to so i changed it. :roll: i'm really new at this edit stuff.

May 21, 2003, 4:13 PM	#8
LCohen Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 251	better . Though I am not a fan of these very obvious editings . If you have photoshop you could use the channel mixer, and cut down on the green and make a monochrome image there. That would give a very dark ground (nice in my eyes).