![]() |
Please critique the photo I took
Hi,
Just want to know from pros how I could improve my picture. Here are details about the pic I took: Camera: Powershot A70 Exposure: 1/800 sec. Lens Aperture: F/2.8 Focal length: 5mm No tripod used. Thanks. http://205.188.137.185/laumel/fall2.jpg |
It looks like you took the shot with the contrast and sharpening on minimum and it works very well. I downloaded it and everything I normally do to my shots detracted from the soft mood of the photo. I shoot soft also but most images want some work in Photoshop. I like the feel of the image just the way it is.
|
Re: Please critique the photo I took
Quote:
I went into PS and used the sponge tool on saturate at 90% flow. I used a large brush (271) and quickly scanned the photo from top to bottom. I then used unsharp mask to 103. http://www.servicewithasmile.com/photos/psfall2.jpg |
Hi
I've played around with your shot in Photoshop. What do you think ? http://www.hertz-ladiges.com/steve/fall2.jpg I've added some sharpness, saturation, removed the line on the road, cropped it a bit and copied some areas to some other places. BTW your lens seems to be unsharp in the middle areas - have you cleaned this lately ? |
man, see I wanna find something like that. So I can have my fiancee fly by in our car so it kicks up all the leaves... 8) :lol:
|
|
Billcollector took a nice photo, I saturated the colors and I assume Kex did the same. After seeing Kex’s photo, I feel I over-saturated the color. All three photos could pass as OK.
Klaus and his version. WOW! :D How did you get the sky to look clear blue? |
Wow guys!!! Thanks a lot!!!
I am really impressed with the improvement. To answer Klaus's question, I don't think it was due to dirty lens. Camera is brand spanking new. And shot the picture in auto mode. My next purchase is going to be a tripod. That would have improved the picture a bit. And finally, UniSonBBS, the road is not wide enough for car. It was just a walking trail. |
I got results similar to those posted and liked your original better of that particular shot. All of the enhanced photos just look like a snapshot. The soft original has an ethereal quality that sets it off. It feels more like you are there than just looking at a picture of the place. Might not work for a print, but I think your original looks a lot better than the enhanced versions on screen.
If you don’t like the effect you might check your settings and bring your contrast, sharpening and saturation up a little in the camera. Like I said I shoot soft as it is much better for post-processing. You get your widest exposure latitude with lowered contrast and sharpening should always be done last in any post-processing. |
My turn
I've been trying to emulate Klaus' effort, but haven't yet got there. This one is a joint effort - using PhotoshopLE, Irfanview and ACDSee.
http://www.pbase.com/image/22425015 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:46 AM. |