|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Apr 28, 2005, 3:47 PM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,710
|
hey guys...
here's a shot i took this morning (5:30 :O) blended two shots together (sky and grass) to keep the high contrast situation controlled (sortof like a graduated neutral density filter keeps the tones inside the films dynamic range.. enjoy :-D Vito |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
Apr 28, 2005, 8:34 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,288
|
Hello Vito! Pretty cool idea, I am going to experiment with my sunset/rise photos!
Love your work! Bob Hammitt |
|
|
|
|
Apr 28, 2005, 10:22 PM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 101
|
Very nice effect... I gotta ask though, how painstaking was the post-process?
 Whatever the effort, to me was worth it. Nice job...Dave... |
|
|
|
|
Apr 28, 2005, 11:50 PM
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,710
|
hey guys
the process isn't particularly painstaking...as long as it's setup correctly... it's a real pain to have to mess with the two images to get them to line up right, so it's best to use a tripod, and avoid movement when changing settings... for a 'better' blend, it would be very difficult, with the using of different opacity brushes at different sizes to get some detail in the trees...but to keep it how it is..it's pretty much a straight sweep with a soft brush (using a mask...if you have elements...the same can be done with the eraser...just a bit tougher, because you can fix your mistakes) and then painting in (with a mask) or erasing the rest of the sky.. all in all, it's not bad...but REALLY worth the color in the sky (or the detail in the field!) thanks for looking  Vito |
|
|
|
|
Apr 29, 2005, 2:57 AM
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,309
|
Vito;
I am a Photoimpact user, and it has built-in, a High Dynamic Range function, that can blend bracketed exposures into a single image. There are other programs, and, I believe, Photoshop actions which do the same thing. The major limitations of these, of course, are having exactly the same elements in each picture, though PI does have a way to brush out parts of one that you don't want included in the final image.(a person moving into the picture, for example) I have used it on occasion when I needed detail in both highlights and shadows. brian |
|
|
|
|
Apr 29, 2005, 4:05 AM
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,038
|
Love the pic !
Canna |
|
|
|
|
Apr 29, 2005, 12:06 PM
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,458
|
One of your best!
Tom, on Point Pelee, Canada |
|
|
|
|
Apr 29, 2005, 8:22 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 137
|
Quote:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tu...blending.shtml No matter what method was used, your photo is very, very nice Vito. Love the composition and color. Makes me want to get out of bed a little earlier. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 29, 2005, 8:28 PM
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 137
|
Here's a photo I took using method #2 from the Luminous Landscape tutorial using bracketed exposures of -1EV and +1EV, but I like Vito's better.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 29, 2005, 9:49 PM
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 197
|
Great job Vito. I really respect your work. I have to say though that the background is not that interesting in this shot. The sky is defintely nice, but the trees are a little boring.However, I think this kind of shot is great practice for this technique. I am sure you're gonna impress me again with another one soon. Keep up the good work. best regards
|
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:18 AM.
