|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 227
|
![]()
I shot this at sunset from the top of the Arch in St. Louis. The windows were so thick and dirty! I tried to find a clean spot to shoot from. I simply held the lens shield against the window for this shot.
Shot with a Sony 707, 1/30, f2.0, ISO 320. This was taken just after I purchased the camera. Had I known it would automatically choose the ISO setting, I would have forced it to stay at 100. Which one is better? ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 734
|
![]()
I like the warm glow of the second one. Nice shots!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 313
|
![]()
I prefer the second one because the orange colour is more consistant throughout the photograph. I think that makes it more balanced.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
|
![]()
I like the second one as well. It's a bit darker, which seems to bring out the orange glow more.
Eric ps. I have to say that I didn't realize what the difference was for a few moments. Weird. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,422
|
![]()
Hi darrell1___
I vote for the second also ![]() Its colors are richer, more saturated and hint at the innate warmth (literally) of a city. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,585
|
![]()
I like the second for picture for the same reason as already mentioned.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,022
|
![]()
dito.
the second picture looks better! great picture by the way ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 388
|
![]() ![]() Great photo!!! Maybe you could level that second one a bit.. that way it would look even better.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|