|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Feb 17, 2016, 7:10 PM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA USA
Posts: 8,116
|
Portrait of my daughter
Using hi key feature in Topaz Adjust
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
Feb 17, 2016, 8:56 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 2,463
|
I don't know Walter. I don't care for that effect on a portrait. Especially on such a beautiful girl.
Maybe on another not as attractive individual in another setting but not for this one.
__________________
A-mount E-mount Canon S95 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2016, 8:53 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hebron, Kentucky (northern Kentucky/Greater Cincinnati):KCVG
Posts: 4,355
|
Quote:
Jehan |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA USA
Posts: 8,116
|
Thanks, guys. How's this?
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2016, 5:48 PM
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I agree with Mike and Jehan regarding the first version.
This one is much better, Walter. =) I notice there's quite a bit of noise in the dark areas behind her. Was this shot at high ISO? Or is this a result of editing; pushing contrast, perhaps? |
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2016, 6:44 PM
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA USA
Posts: 8,116
|
Taken in 2009 with a Canon 40D at 800 ISO. It was a heavy crop from a larger photo with another person.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2016, 8:14 PM
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hebron, Kentucky (northern Kentucky/Greater Cincinnati):KCVG
Posts: 4,355
|
I like it a lot better. There seems to be loss of detail in hair and face. Looks like too much noise reduction? Is it still being run through Topaz?
Jehan |
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:10 PM.
