|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14
|
![]()
I'm thinking of buyin either one of them, which one would you recommend speedwise?
A USB2-reader (preferable multifunctional, with slots for CF and SD, although I'm using SD more) or A PCMCIA-adapter for in the laptop? I know you can't put CF and SD in it, but then i'd go for SD only. WHich one is faster? A PCMCIA-adapter looks much better of course. NOthing clinging on the laptop etc. |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
|
![]()
The average adapter is much slower than a USB 2 reader. (I have one of those adapters.)
There is a new type of adapter that is much faster than a USB 2 reader, I believe, but I believe you'll need a relatively new (within the last 2-3 years) laptop to take advantage of it. I could be wrong on that point, so others here... please correct me! All the PCMCIA adapters that I've heard of take a CF card. Then you can get an adapter to make the other types of cards fit. I bet you could put an SD card into one. Eric |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,422
|
![]()
USB reader.
Not even close. I have adapter for my laptop which sometimes is "seen" and sometimes is not "seen". USB would be "portable" between your desktop and laptop. Good luck ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
|
![]()
I've never had my PCMCIA adapter not work, but maybe I'm lucky.
Unless you shell out the money to buy the fast adapter, get a 2.0 USB one. And even then, it sounds like the adapters don't always work. Eric |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|