Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > Memory Cards, Microdrives, Card Readers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 15, 2004, 5:17 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9

I just bought a Coolpix 8700 and already own a nice IBM 1GB Microdrive.So far, my research tells me that the speed of the compactflash card DOES make a difference in this camera, but does not make a difference is some other cameras like the Canon digital rebel. I really want to reduce the lag time between photos and would appreciate some help. I'd even settle for a 512 card. I continue to find conflicting opions. Please help. Thank you.

This following site seems to have the most complete professional writeup on compactflash cards. It even does testing on specific cameras that shows that the same card may be faster on one camera versus another.

David 8700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 15, 2004, 9:11 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803

Nikon has been good about supporting the Lexar WA technology in their DSLRs. I don't know if they support it in the 8700, but you should find out. If it does, then get a Lexar 512MB 40x WA card. Its a good card, and it will be fast in that camera if it supports WA. If not, its still a fast card, but maybe not "the fastest" which is what you asked about.

The SanDisk Extreme (what a stupid name) is also a very fast card. It looks to be faster than the WA enabled card in the D100, which supports WA.

eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2004, 1:17 PM   #3
jmoro's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 32

Hi There.
I use the following in my 8700 and it works very well. I believe Steve used it in some of his tests in the past....

It's a Rytek ridata card. I have three 512mb's and so far they have worked flawlessly.

Good Luck
jmoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2004, 1:28 PM   #4
Senior Member
sjms's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,735

realize that your 8700 has limited processing and battery power, so there are constraints levied on the transfer/write speed from the camera to the card. this is is the price that is paid for size and cost of the unit. i can say that both sandisk ultra 2 and the lexar pro cards will perform within fractions of each other. in short the cards have a higher capabilty then the camera does.:O

if your research started off withe the enclosed card i would agree that better card are available. they don't throw oin the best available. using an older 1GB MD for a reference is not a good starting point either. their performance in various cameras has been varied to say the least. you will hit a ceiling in xfr rates and i can say with fair certainty that both the sandisk and the lexar high end cards will exceed the camera.

you have to watch which D100 you are referring to. the earlier models needed to have a firmware UG to access the WA capabilities and it was not free. the later models came with it built in. some older lexar WA cards had issues with that firmware UG and they themselves then needed a firmware UG. all my lexar cards were updated and returned to me in a 4 day round trip to lexars home at their cost.

sjms is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:16 PM.