Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > Memory Cards, Microdrives, Card Readers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 19, 2003, 5:15 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 37
Default Compact flash rating

what is the differenc in compact flash writing and rewriting speeds
scandisk doesnt say but scandick ultras say 2.8 MB a sec.
Lexier say 12 times which means what in MB or Kb
thx for any light on this subject
matt81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 19, 2003, 6:23 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
sjms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,735
Default

1x is 150K per second. lexar goes up to 40x now. but its all relative to your cameras ability to transfer. all cameras are not created equal in that department.

cf cards in fact all memory cards read faster then they write. its a substantially less electrically intensive function.

all those speeds ratings are supposed to be write speeds
sjms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2003, 11:27 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
Default

matt81

I would post a question in the forum dedicated to the camera's maker and ask what CF card people like.

Two cards from different companies rated at the same speed will not work the same in the same camera. The way the camera interfaces with the CF card could be a better match to the design of one of the two cards.... and that will translate into a faster write time.

And in the end, it's all about the write time.
eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2003, 7:45 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,162
Default

Quote:
And in the end, it's all about the write time
To make this absolutely clear, write time for a particular camera/card combination is NOT the same as the specified card speed, nor does it seem there is a relationship which works every time!
voxmagna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2003, 2:39 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
Default

voxmagna

Good point. I meant that, but didn't say it explicitly.

If anyone wants to see an example of card/camera testing, check out:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/mul...e.asp?cid=6007

They are all high end cards, so it doesn't help everyone. but it is interesting to see a card be slow in one camera and faster in another.
eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2003, 4:26 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,162
Default

eric s .....Thanks. didn't find my 602 in the database, mainly high end cams. However, info on card edge marking is useful if you've got a card that works and need to know the next one you buy has the same architecture inside.
voxmagna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2003, 8:05 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
Default

voxmagna

I have the same problem with that database as well. I learned a lot about CF by reading it, but they are all expensive cameras.

Still, its a nice resource and I check it occasionally for the "same architecture" reason you give.
eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2003, 11:43 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
sjms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,735
Default

these are the cameras that will use the speed ratings of the cards. lets face it our cameras are limited in many ways due to constraints of price and power and processing. the referred to the DB to show how even the big guns react to differently to different mfgrs cards. my camera isn't ther either and of all the digicams in the fixed lens type it has the largest buffer at 64MB.

so when someone whips out a 40x card and plugs it in ther $300 digicam and says it performed x times speedier than the 32x card they just had in it. read with a tablespoon of salt not a grain.
sjms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2003, 1:23 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,162
Default

Yes, and isn't it funny how we are all pc literate and can compare one motherboard spec with another to benchmark speed before we buy, with a sort of linear expectation of performance versus price, but nobody asks similar questions about digicam cpu's, cache memory and architecture!

All we can think about is the memory card that plugs into this 'pc motherboard' Bit like worrying about the transfer rate to a floppy disc on a Z80. Add a hard drive and the bottle neck stays with the Z80.
voxmagna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2003, 5:43 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
sjms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,735
Default

we generally don't because most of us are blinded with the instant gratification of digital images. it's magic you know.
sjms is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:17 PM.