Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 16, 2006, 2:54 AM   #1
mrb's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 84

Hello -

I printed a few pictures on photo paper for the first time today. I bought some cheap photo paper from Staples so that I could experiment ($1.94 for 50 pack 4"x6", and $1.94 for 30 pack 8.5"x11").

The first few pics came out pretty good, but I have a few questions. My printer is a HP PSC 2355 all-in-one, and HP makes a special photo ink cartridge for the printer. Is the photo cartridge worth buying? Also, is there a big difference in paper quality? What type ofpaperis good, and where to buy it?

Or, would a dedicated photo printer be recommended in lieu of my HP PSC 2355?
mrb is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Apr 17, 2006, 10:49 PM   #2
Senior Member
mtclimber's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143


Generally speaking, "all in one" printers with just a very few exceptions, do not do as good a job as printers designed specifically as photo printers.

mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 20, 2006, 8:33 AM   #3
Senior Member
rjseeney's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taylor Mill, Kentucky
Posts: 2,398

There is a big difference in paper quality. It's a good idea to use your printer manufacturers paper. The inks and paper are developed to be used in combination to achieve the best fade resistance and ink coverage. There will be less splotching and smearing. Cheap papers tend to fade very quickly.

The photo ink usually provides sharper blacks and more gloss and will provide the best quality and permanence.

You will find that it is not cheap to print at home, especially with an all in one or basic printer. Photos drain ink quickly, and cheaper printers don't produce great quality prints and again are prone to fading. If you're not willing to invest in a photo quality printer and matching supplies, you can get great quality prints from you're local photo processor (target, Wal-mart, CVS etc.)
rjseeney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 21, 2006, 7:12 PM   #4
Junior Member
dazp1970's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 19

rjseeney's right.

I know I've posted this somewhere before, but I was reading the same thing on http://www.digital-photography-tips....-printing.htmlabout printing at home.

Seems like we're wasting our time. A better bet is to go to your local photo processors - cheaper, faster, and probably better quality too!
dazp1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 23, 2006, 8:04 PM   #5
Senior Member
amazingthailand's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 851

I'll have to third that. Printing at home is not cost effective, mainly due to the very high cost of inks. To get the best quality, you will need a very good photo quality printer and then you must use the paper and inks from the printer manufacturer.

There are exceptions to the manufacturer's ink and paper combination, but you will have to find out which inks and papers will work acceptably by trial and error - a costly proposition. I imagine, somewhere on the web, there is a list of what paper/ink combinations will work with which printers.

To make matters worse, it seems most printers tell you to replace your inks way too early.
amazingthailand is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:41 AM.