Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 4, 2004, 12:01 PM   #1
Junior Member
ISProf's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 24

Givenvarious software available to capture a still image from digital video, and given the lackluster resolution, etc. of on-board still capture capability, why should I look for this feature when I'm deciding on a camcorder? As the other features in which I'm interested seem much more important (optical zoom, optical image stabilization, 3 CCD, etc.), should I put any weight on the still image capability? My primary motivation in adding a camcorder to my inventory is the ability to capture moving targets - something I'm not successful with in general - as well as being able to see the action later. A secondary motivation is the seemingly more abundant shoulder-type stabilizers available for camcorders that make long hikes and travel less burdensome. Also, would most of you agree that miniDV is the better format? Thanks!
ISProf is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jul 4, 2004, 12:45 PM   #2
JimC's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Savannah, GA (USA)
Posts: 22,378

Well, as a general rule, the video quality on a digital still camera leaves a lot to be desired. The same usually applies to still photos from a video camera.

However, manufacturers have been making some advances in both directions (better movies from still cameras and better still photos from movie cameras).

I'd be curious to see how this new Panasonic stacks up when it starts shipping in August:


JimC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 4, 2004, 2:06 PM   #3
Junior Member
jakeusticus's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 7

I would always go with a dedicated camcorder and digital camera, because neither one will do the other's job as well as having dedicated equipment for separate tasks.

Digital Camcorders can produce stills, but generally of little more than 1MP- but they do superb video compared to the low resolution and memory consuming video produced by digital still cameras.

It is possible to produce stills from video, my Minolta Z1 will do it automatically if I want, but they are still very low resolution stills, no more than 640x480.

You can also capture stills from video taken on a camcorder once downloaded through an editor.

And so overall, I don't think you need to look for the option of a camcorder for digital stills- the stills are low resolution, almost no good for photo printing at all and the camcorders aregenerallly more expensive- save yourself the money and buy a digital camera- you can get 2/3 Megapixels for under £100 which will produce better results than any camcorder.

And yes, MiniDV is currently the best format, unless you want to go up to an Mpeg4 camcorder- extremely expensive, use flash memory and use lot's of it!!

Hope this helps!
jakeusticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 5, 2004, 3:34 AM   #4
Senior Member
Mikefellh's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,707

While I agree with the replies stated above, there may be a higher-end digital camcorder that can produce high-quality stills (better than TV quality). Unfortunately it's been too many years since I've been out of the video business.
Mikefellh is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:36 PM.