|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Sep 6, 2018, 7:58 AM
|
#21 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,699
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2018, 8:06 AM
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,699
|
How about, instead of a link to the photo, you include a link to the webpage the photo is on?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2018, 8:22 AM
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Outside of Rochester, New York
Posts: 74
|
Okay, I posted the photo in the critique section!
Linda |
|
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2018, 8:17 PM
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,699
|
That's a nice shoot, but not really a good test of a macro setup. In addition, the reduced resolution for posting here would hide any lack of sharpness. Typically, inexpensive close-up lenses are only sharp in the center, with sharpness falling off toward the corners. By contrast, macro lenses are sharp from corner to corner.
Try a shot of a postage stamp or fine newsprint.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 7, 2018, 12:26 AM
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Outside of Rochester, New York
Posts: 74
|
Will do! I really love macro. Will the tube extenders do a good job of keeping the image sharp throughout?
Linda |
|
|
|
|
Sep 7, 2018, 7:25 AM
|
#26 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,699
|
Extension tubes don't have any optical properties of their own, so your results depend entirely on the quality of the lens you use them with.
As it happens, the 18-55 and 55-250 are pretty good. I wouldn't expect too much from the 75-300.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:40 AM.
