Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 9, 2002, 10:33 AM   #1
Senior Member
Steves's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 298
Default big pixels vs little pixels:5700 vs D100?

Call me skeptical!

I am a scientist and, by tainting skeptical. The Nikon rep tells me that the D100 is inherently sharper than the 5700 because the chip is larger in the D100.

This does not make sense to me.

any good quality lens should resolve well beyond the physical pixel size at the image plane of either camera. Putting the pixels closer together should, I think, only mean losing resolution IF the circle of confusion of the optics is bigger than the the size of the pixels.

Moreover, assuming that the lens is designed to provide optimal sharpness at its designed image size on the film plane, then, as we all know using only PART of the image, e.g. as in digital zoom, means LOSS of resolution power of the lens! BUT, this is exactly what is done in a D-SLR since the chip covers only part of the image plane.

Frankly, all other things being equal (and I am sure there are other considerations) the 5700 should, IMO give a higher resolution than the D100!
Steves is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jul 9, 2002, 3:05 PM   #2
Ben Hoog.'s Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 48
Default Pixel size

I think he meant that the pixel size of the D100 is bigger. Therefore you would get better images.
Ben Hoog. is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:43 AM.