Do I really need these two Tamron lenses?

[jack55]

I had many Tamron lenses over the years and love them.

Right now I have these two lenses to go with my D5300:
Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3
Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3

My question is will this lens Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 benefit me?

Most of my shooting is landscapes and wildlife/birds.
A lot of shooting is in low light.
See my website:
https://moskovita-photography.com/

The above are backups to my main outfit and for friends that go on some trips with me.

[TCav]

If you're talking about the unstabilized version, it runs rings around your 18-270 where their ranges overlap.

[jack55]

Originally Posted by TCav

If you're talking about the unstabilized version, it runs rings around your 18-270 where their ranges overlap.

It's not the VC version

[TCav]

The unstabilized Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 is way sharper than the 18-270, and has less distortion, vignetting and chromatic aberration, so your landscape photography will benefit greatly.

[jack55]

Originally Posted by TCav

The unstabilized Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 is way sharper than the 18-270, and has less distortion, vignetting and chromatic aberration, so your landscape photography will benefit greatly.

Thank you... I just ordered one.