|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Posts: 87
|
![]() ![]() verses ![]() Canon's is alot clearer to read imo. I also like their color scheme better. Nikon's font and interface colors seems to have a retro look. But the newer D5000 and D3000 camera menus have been restyled. Opinions? Last edited by NothingRare; Mar 30, 2010 at 1:59 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taylor Mill, Kentucky
Posts: 2,398
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 15
|
![]()
To me a camera display needs to be functional more than it needs to be pretty. I guess you could argue that the Canon display is cleaner, making it easier to read and in that regard, it would be better.
On the other hand if you're more used to using Nikons, the display mimics the older Nikon LCD displays. For a photographer who's used to that interface, this would probably be a benefit. At first glance, I don't like the D3000 and D5000 displays. They seem to take the GUI a little too far. Again, to me the diaply has to work well more than it has to look nice. Though I guess I could get used to it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|