Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon dSLR

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 10, 2009, 4:43 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 109
Default

I took my D5000 to a Flyers hockey game this week. I set the ISO to 800 and used my 55-200 Nikon VR lens. I was very pleased to see such great shots. In using the 11 point focus, it was able to keep the players in focus while they were moving on the ice, and the clarity was pretty dang good. I love this camera! I will post a shot or two with the setting info when I get a chance.
__________________
Nikon D5000 with 18-55, and 55-200 vr lens
Nikon SB 600 flash
Nikon S640
Nikon Coolpix 5700
Canon Elan SLR

Glenn
Blueberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2009, 6:52 PM   #22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueberry View Post
First the size of the camera was smaller than the D90.
Not to debate the D90 vs. the D5000 as both are excellent choices however to clarify, the D90 is NOT bigger than the D5000. The D5000 is actually slightly larger. See the specs:

D90: 132 x 103 x 77 mm
D5000: 127 x 104 x 80 mm (5 x 4.1 x 3.2 in)

Multiplying this out shows that the D90 is 1,046,892 square mm while the D5000 is 1,056,640 square mm
barryg9999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2009, 7:33 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,572
Default

That would be cubic millimeters, not square millimeters.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2009, 9:45 PM   #24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TCav View Post
That would be cubic millimeters, not square millimeters.
Good point. You are correct.
barryg9999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 15, 2009, 9:20 AM   #25
Senior Member
 
rjseeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taylor Mill, Kentucky
Posts: 2,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barryg9999 View Post
Not to debate the D90 vs. the D5000 as both are excellent choices however to clarify, the D90 is NOT bigger than the D5000. The D5000 is actually slightly larger. See the specs:

D90: 132 x 103 x 77 mm
D5000: 127 x 104 x 80 mm (5 x 4.1 x 3.2 in)

Multiplying this out shows that the D90 is 1,046,892 square mm while the D5000 is 1,056,640 square mm
Physically, they are virtually the same size. However, the D5000 is a couple ounces lighter (about 10%) which is noticeable and may be what the poster was referring to.
rjseeney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2009, 4:21 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
jack55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 949
Default

I may as well add that I chose the Nikon D5000 over the D90 myself.
The swing factor for me was since at age 57, I can't bend over or lay in awkward positions anymore like I use to, so the tilting LCD was the deal breaker.
Besides, I had the Nikon P90 for awhile and got very spoiled using the tilting LCD on that.
I really missed it when I was using the Pentax K20D, so I made the switch to the D5000.

Also lenses aren't a factor as I only use two lenses. The Sigma 18-250mm & 50-500mm.

So, it is really a matter of preference on which camera you want, the D90 or D5000.
__________________
http://www.moskovita-photography.com/
http://1-4u-computer-graphics.com/mo...hotography.htm
Nikon D500 w/Nikkor AF-S 200-500mm F/5.6E ED VR
Nikon D700 w/Nikkor 20mm f/2.8
Nikkor 18-140mm f/3.5-4.5D ED VR
Nikon TC-14E-III 1.4x AF-S / 2 Nikon SB-800
Manfrotto carbon fiber tripod & mono-pod
Samsung S7 Edge
jack55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2009, 7:27 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
kazuya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,007
Default

i bought a D90 to replace my pentax k20D, i felt the autofucus let the camera down so i switched to nikon. the D5000 wasnt out when i bought the D90 however i still think id have gone for the D90 as the D5000 would have been to much of a step backwards from the K20D. i would have loved the D90 to have tilt screen, ive had a tilt screen fuji before and it was a fantastic feature.
kazuya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2009, 8:47 AM   #28
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deadshot View Post
Just as a matter of interest. What I have done is I have made my Function button over to ISO and that enables me to quickly flick over to whatever ISO I need at the time ,without having to go through the Menu or i routes.
That is exactly what I did with my D-60 and it works great. The ISO can be changed very quickly with this method.

.
Jim Bledsoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 27, 2009, 5:41 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pelham, AL
Posts: 248
Default

I have an older Tamron Zoom I used on my D90S. Would this Zoom work with the D90? It is a Tamron 28 to 200 AF, Aspherical.
rlewis0083 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 27, 2009, 5:41 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pelham, AL
Posts: 248
Default

I mean my old N90S, sorry about that.
rlewis0083 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:24 AM.