|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Dec 15, 2014, 3:08 PM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Hendersonville Tn
Posts: 9
|
18-105mm, DIY repair?
It's not an internal thing, it's just this ring or seal or whatever this thing is called. Looking for suggestions on how to repair it without having to send it off and spend $$$ because of it.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
Dec 15, 2014, 6:52 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
My guess is that any decent camera shop can fix it for you.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 15, 2014, 11:59 PM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 303
|
Have the same lens and the same thing happened.
Was going to get it fixed then someone I had lent the lens to broke the plastic mount.
__________________
Nikon D600, D90, D70, N90s, FM2, Canon S3 1S, Panasonic FZ35; Nikon 18-105 VR, 28-70 2.8 Sigma, 35-70 Nikkor, 70-200 2.8 Sigma, 70-300 4-5.6 Sigma, 85 1.8D Nikkor, 55-300 4-5.6 Nikkor, Sigma 17-50 2.8. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 16, 2014, 8:07 AM
|
#4 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Hendersonville Tn
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
 What did you replace it with? This lens, and a 35mm 1.8 are the only two that I have. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 16, 2014, 6:01 PM
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia, New South Wales central coast
Posts: 3,645
|
G'day William
It appears to be a fixed / cosmetic / dust seal sort of ring Would a few drops of superglue hold it well enough for your continued use? Phil
__________________
Has Lumix mirrorless & superzoom cameras and loves their amazing capabilities Spends 8-9 months each year travelling Australia Recent images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/ |
|
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2014, 9:20 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Hendersonville Tn
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
I think that you're correct, but I'm not familiar enough with types of plastics and rubbers to know what kind of glue to use.  Superglue can cause more problems than it solves if it isn't the right kind of adhesive for the job.
Last edited by WilliamTn; Dec 17, 2014 at 11:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2014, 10:30 AM
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
There's always Duck Tape...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2014, 11:53 AM
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,309
|
Superglue could be a little more permanent than what you want for this type of repair, if the lens should need service in the future. A solvent based glue such as model airplane cement might be a better choice, applied with a toothpick.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2014, 3:28 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia, New South Wales central coast
Posts: 3,645
|
Quote:
Phil
__________________
Has Lumix mirrorless & superzoom cameras and loves their amazing capabilities Spends 8-9 months each year travelling Australia Recent images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2014, 6:07 PM
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
A solvent based glue only works when the solvent dissolves both parts you're trying to glue together. While it might work on (what I presume is) the plastic ring, it won't work on the metal ring, so that's out.
Rubber cement requires that it be applied to both surfaces and allowed to (partially) dry, which would probably not work well in this application. It seems to me that the two loose rings are entirely cosmetic. It also seems to me that the lens looks ok without them. Would you consider just cutting them off?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.
