Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 1, 2005, 10:52 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
Default

This lens cost about $330. A generic equivalent w/ aplastic lens is about $179.

Is it worth the price difference? It'll allow one to go all the way to 450 mm focal length.
TomSawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 12, 2005, 10:39 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 52
Default

The ED glass is a great purchase to make, for a pile of reasons. First of all, that lens is one of Nikon's most popular, it has great performance, it is reasonably priced, and should you want to sell it later, you won't have much of a problem. Other lenses may be cheaper, but they won't hold a candle to it for overall image quality. The differences will seem negligible if you are only doing 4x6s, but for bigger prints and professional quality, you'll appreciate the quality.
ericsvendsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 13, 2005, 12:00 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2
Default

I think he's refering to the "G" series by Nikon which doesn't have the ED in it.
svtcontour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 19, 2005, 1:14 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10
Default

That being the case take a look at the Sigma 70-300mm APO Super Macro II.
TivoManiac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 AM.