|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 569
|
![]()
I was about to order a 50/f1.8 Nikon lens for low light shots when I saw the new Tamron 60/f2.0 macro and thought that I could get both speed and macro in one lens. The price of the Tamron is higher than the 60/2.8 Nikon micro putting me off a little.
Anyone have some thoughts regarding these three (I plan to purchase one only)? |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
![]()
As thrilled as I am about the Tamron 60/2.0, it comes down to this for me.
The Tamron 60/2.0 Macro is $569. The Tamron 90/2.8 Macro is $405. The Nikon 50/1.8 is $150. Save $14 and buy the two lenses.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 569
|
![]()
Wow, two for the price of one - something to consider. Thanks for the reply TCav.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|