Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 12, 2010, 9:11 PM   #1
Senior Member
Logo10heli's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 118
Default Which lens for Yellowstone : 18-200VR or 70-300VR ?

Planning a trip to Yellowstone National Park later this year. Planning to take our Panasonic FZ-35 but I'm also considering a D-90 purchase. I really miss the fast startup and high frames per second. I'm also wondering if the higher ISO capability of the D-90 would help the low light performance of these lenses.

Looking for recommendations and or observations about lens choices for this park or the Rocky Mountains in general. I've owned an 18-200VR and it was a wonderful lens. It's great for close-ups and scenery. Would I miss the extra reach of the 70-300VR ?
Logo10heli is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 15, 2010, 11:04 AM   #2
Senior Member
deadshot's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hertfordshire UK
Posts: 759

I have the Pana FZ7 which gives me a 420mm reach so I guess yours gives you a lot more.
So if you get the 70-300 VR what will you do for close ups ,rely on the Pana?.
If you are interested in low light capabilty it sounds like a twin lens kit is needed especially if you want the 300mm reach.
I have the 18-200Vr and find it is very good in low light but the extra 100mm would obviously stretch it a bit more. If price is a factor why not look at a cheaper body + two lenses.The VR is good indoors in poor lighting.
The D5000 is very good.
As you are getting new lenses the in body focusing on the D90 isn't so important.
D5100 +18-200mVR Nikkor lens.
SB400 Flash, ML-L3 Remote.
SB 700 Flash
Holster + Shoulder Bag.
Beike carbon 4 section tripod/monopod
Gorillapod SLR Zoom + BH1 ball head
Panasonic FZ1000
Panasonic FZ200
Nissin D i40 Flash
+ SLR Gorillapod
deadshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18, 2010, 11:29 AM   #3
Senior Member
pbjunkiee's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pensacola Fl
Posts: 914

d90 with a sigma 70-200 f2.8 would be win, or if you want the nikkor 70-300 3.5-5.6 af vr is actually getting cheaper now. You have to remember the 90 has a cropped sensor, so these two lense become 105-275, and 105- 400 lenses.
pbjunkiee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2010, 7:13 AM   #4
Senior Member
Logo10heli's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 118

Thanks for the replies.

I seem to be doing more nature photography these days, so I'm leaning towards the 70-300 VR lens for the extra reach. I've had one in the past and it gives good results without a tripod.

Does the Sigma 70-200 2.8 come in VR ?

What do users think of the Nikon 18-105 VR ? It seems to be a popular kit lens. Would this be a good companion to the 70-300 VR ?
Logo10heli is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:09 AM.