|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 37
|
![]()
Does anyone, or is it not advisable, fit a UV and a polarising filter, together? If so, what order, i.e.: first on the lens?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eastern Ontario Canada
Posts: 823
|
![]()
There is no reason to have both of those filters on the lens at the same time. Too many filters in use can cause vignetting (clipping of the corners) at a minimum.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 71
|
![]()
The only time I did this is with a IR filter and my primary filter is a Pro1 ultra thin UV filter. I guessed it wouldnt affect the image as it was going to be a long exposure.
But as above the polarising does get affected especially if you are not using a Ultra thin filter in front of it. I suggest you use the polarising filter by itself. Note for wide angles you still get vignetting regardless how thin your filter is. I realise that on my 17-55mmDX and it happens on the wide end. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 37
|
![]()
OK thanks. I wasn't sure if this was the norm or not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 185
|
![]()
or you can invest in a Cokin P series system.Filters are quite inexpensive and they will fit all your lens with an adaptor
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|