|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Hey everyone....I just got a d50 & have been doing some research on a second lense to go with my 18-55.
I'm trying to figure out the price difference between the two lenses....the Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G is $60 cheaper than the 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED. Is it simply because of the platic vs metal housing? Any recomendations between the two would be greatly appreciated.....I'd like to add a nice zoom lense. Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 90
|
![]()
Hi
the other reason is because the glass used is of a better quality as indicated by the ED designation it has less flare and abberation problems in theory |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Since I bought a circ polarizer and a uv filter for my 18-55, I'll probably buy the 55-200 so I don't have to buy more filters.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|